Skip to main content

Blog Post 1


Everything Right With Big Mouth



Big Mouth appeals to audiences because of its relatable and raunchy humor that is delivered by the main characters, pubescent teens attempting to navigate their way through middle school. The uncomfortable results of the majority of their misfortunes effectively illustrate the cringe-worthy experience that all members of our society goes through.  The exaggerated stereotypes of middle school students is thoroughly entertaining as they often seek aid from absurd characters around them such as the ghost of Duke Ellington, a hypersexual supernatural force residing in one of the boys' attics, always willing to give advice to the sexually confused and uncomfortable enigmas that are the boys. To make the whole concept of puberty and the raging hormones that we as pre-teens experience, puberty has two characters, the hormone monster and monstress. Because they embody all the emotions that both boys and girls experience while going through puberty, the overly hyperbolized characters delivered by Maya Rudolph and Nick Kroll perfectly express the feelings that overwhelm helpless young kids across the globe. To top the whole series off, the animation of the characters is so well executed with their large heads and small bodies. Animation gives leeway for the show to become more creative, surreal, and discuss certain things like being transported into a porn dimension, that could not be depicted if it were live action.  The writing always delivers hilarity and wit that exposes the uncomfortable and confusing time. Although the show does not appeal to all because of the high level of vulgarity, individuals often enjoy and find Big Mouth humorous. Each episode touches down on a different issue as the boys and girls attempt to survive the brutality of puberty. The crude humor of the show shocks and for this reason pleases. I often end my binge of the Nextflix Original with tears in my eyes and a gaping mouth, shook and happy. 

Comments

  1. I always wonder why they picked Duke Ellington. Any thoughts?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lead Blog, September 7th

Vines That Keep Me From Quitting Life In no particular order: https://youtu.be/hamKHb_JEEg 1).  IT terrifies. IT mercilessly takes children and consumes their souls. Pennywise lures Georgie in with the promise of candy, popcorn, and the circus. We all assumed we would be safe from this deadly trap now that our adolescence is over and our desire for juvenile treats and entertainment has passed. But wait. IT's power has adapted and now we are no longer safe. IT now entices with... No...Can it be? PENIS ENLARMENT PILLS? We are all doomed. https://youtu.be/_U_UytUgnDc 2). The Wii. Let that sink in. A wii is not just another game. Heavens no! The wii aided us in our childhood and provided the content we needed. It was not just another source  of entertainment, it was a lifestyle and we (no pun intended) all lived for it. After a long day of dealing with other small children, we all needed that break from reality; an escape if you will. And the wii was always ther...

Blog 2

I agree the most with Marie Collins Swabey's idea that incongruity is found humorous because the two aspects are irrelevant to one another in a acceptable scenario. Often the humor is found within the topic of discussion because the two concepts are dissimilar. Swabey distinguishes that there are two forms of incongruity, logical and factual, and that the context in which incongruity is utilized may differ. Logical, which infringe on the laws of logic, are usually entertaining because the person utilizing the logical incongruity makes a false statement, which overlaps with the idea of superiority theory. Logical incongruity appeals to our sense of rational form where as factual appeals more to the incompatibility of certain topics. This form of incongruity is demonstrated when the association of said topics are viewed as incompatible or abnormal to the audience. Although Roger Scruton disagrees with the theory that the abnormality of the incongruent pairing of two ideas in not wha...